Ritchie v. Saul
| Matthew Roy Ritchie |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA Notify |
| 1:2019cv03302 |
| November 15, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| Stephanie A Gallagher |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 12/6/2019. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued 60 days as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (dass, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; directing counsel to effectuate service. Signed by Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher on 11/26/2019. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Vickie LeDuc on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (kos, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Matthew Roy Ritchie(Melanson, Theodore) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Matthew Roy Ritchie. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Melanson, Theodore) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
