Merritt v. Saul
| Carl Eugene Merritt, Jr. |
| Andrew M. Saul |
| SSA Notify |
| 1:2020cv01911 |
| June 25, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah L. Boardman |
| George Levi Russell |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Summons Issued 60 days as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; and directing Plaintiff's counsel to effectuate service of the summons and complaint on Defendant. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 7/6/2020. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 6/29/2020. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to U.S. Magistrate Judge by Kelly M Marzullo on behalf of Andrew M. Saul. (bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Carl Eugene Merritt, Jr(Melanson, Theodore) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Carl Eugene Merritt, Jr. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Melanson, Theodore) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
