Thomas v. Maryland et al
Tyrrel Thomas |
Prime Care Medical Inc., Aramark Food, B.C.D.C., Maryland and Baltimore Co. |
1:2020cv02716 |
September 21, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
George Levi Russell |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing the complaint without prejudice. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 11/2/2020. (c/m 11/2/2020) (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 Mail Returned as Undeliverable. Mail sent to Tyrrel Thomas (Attachments: #1 First Page of Returned Document) (jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement (Attachments: #1 Cover Letter)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 ORDER giving Finance Officer 21 days to submit an inmate account summary for the past six months of incarceration; giving Plaintiff 28 days to file a supplement to the complaint. Signed by Judge George Levi Russell, III on 9/25/2020. (jb5, Deputy Clerk)(c/m-09/25/2020) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Tyrrel Thomas(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Aramark Food, B.C.D.C., Baltimore Co., Maryland, Prime Care Medical Inc. filed by Tyrrel Thomas. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(bmhs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.