Dorey v. Saul
Plaintiff: Daniel Francis Dorey
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Interested Party: SSA Notify
Case Number: 1:2020cv03049
Filed: October 20, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Deborah L. Boardman
Referring Judge: Catherine C Blake
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 17, 2020 Filing 8 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Daniel Francis Dorey. Andrew M Saul served on 11/10/2020, answer due 1/11/2021.(Nicoll, William)
November 5, 2020 Filing 7 Summons Issued 60 days as to Andrew M Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
November 5, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 11/5/2020. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
November 3, 2020 Filing 5 NOTICE by Daniel Francis Dorey (Nicoll, William)
November 3, 2020 Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Daniel Francis Dorey(Nicoll, William)
October 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge Catherine C. Blake on 10/21/2020. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
October 21, 2020 Filing 2 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint filed by Daniel Francis Dorey was filed incorrectly. ***The following attachments or exhibits are missing - Summons. To correct this problem, file Summons using the event Notice (Other) and linkSummons to #1 Complaint. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
October 21, 2020 The case of Dorey v. Saul, has been opened in the District of Maryland. The case number is 1:20-cv-03049-CCB. PLEASE NOTE: You must pay the case filing fee within 48 hours. To pay online, select the event Civil Case Filing Fee which is found under Civil Events --> Other Filings --> Other Documents. Otherwise, forward a check made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and note the assigned case number on the check or cover letter. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
October 21, 2020 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge by Kelly M Marzullo on behalf of Andrew M Saul (kw2s, Deputy Clerk)
October 20, 2020 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M Saul, filed by Daniel Francis Dorey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Nicoll, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dorey v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Daniel Francis Dorey
Represented By: William James Nicoll
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M Saul
Represented By: Kelly M Marzullo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Notify
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?