Myles v. Laboratory Corporation of America
| Charlene Myles |
| Laboratory Corporation of America and Laboratory Corporation of America doing business as Labcorp |
| 1:2020cv03181 |
| November 3, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah K Chasanow |
| Labor: Family and Medical Leave Act |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 fm |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #4 consent motion for extension of time. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's complaint is now due January 15, 2021. Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 12/18/2020. (Chasanow, Deborah)
|
| Filing 4 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint by Laboratory Corporation of America(Lambrakopoulos, Stavroula) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Stavroula E Lambrakopoulos on behalf of Laboratory Corporation of America (Lambrakopoulos, Stavroula) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Laboratory Corporation of America.(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Laboratory Corporation of America ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8944609.), filed by Charlene Myles. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Dansicker, Andrew) |
| Case Assigned to Judge Deborah K. Chasanow. (ko, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
