Cochran v. Eaves et al
Jeremy Shane Cochran |
Angela M. Eaves and Stephen M. Waldron |
1:2021cv02405 |
September 20, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Theodore D Chuang |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; dismissing #1 Complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e), without requiringservice on Defendants; striking the case; directing the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 10/28/2021. (c/m 10/29/2021 jj2, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 Correspondence from the Clerk confirming receipt of Correspondence from Jeremy Shane Cochran requesting case status.(c/m 10/15/2021 jj2, Deputy Clerk) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/15/2021: #1 Attachment Main Document) (jj2s, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 4 Correspondence from Jeremy Shane Cochran re: case status (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jj2, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 9/24/2021. (c/m 9/24/2021 heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jeremy Shane Cochran(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Angela M. Eaves, Stephen M. Waldron, filed by Jeremy Shane Cochran. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.