Watkins v. Lyons et al
| Nafiz Shaun Watkins |
| Keith Lyons, Michael Resnick, Dayona Corcoran, Steven T. Moyer, Baltimore City, Washington County, The Deputy Warden for Security at The Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown, Jamie Farris, Correctional Officer Perry, Correctional Officer Didawick, Correctional Sergeant Lockard David, Correctional Officer Thrush, Correctional Officer Silva, Correctional Officer Mills, Correctional Officer Wills, Correctional Officer Kyeremeh and Correctional Officer Hutzell |
| 1:2021cv02466 |
| September 27, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Levi Russell |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baltimore City, Correctional Officer Didawick, Correctional Officer Hutzell, Correctional Officer Kyeremeh, Correctional Officer Mills, Correctional Officer Perry, Correctional Officer Silva, Correctional Officer Thrush, Correctional Officer Wills, Correctional Sergeant Lockard David, Dayona Corcoran, Jamie Farris, Keith Lyons, Michael Resnick, Steven T. Moyer, The Deputy Warden for Security at The Maryland Correctional Institution-Hagerstown, Washington County, filed by Nafiz Shaun Watkins. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jb5, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
