Weeks v. BJA Masonry, LLC et al
| Daniel J. Weeks |
| BJA Masonry, LLC, Gilbert C. Borradaile and Carol Borradaile |
| 1:2021cv03064 |
| December 1, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| J Mark Coulson |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Defendants' Consent Motion for Extension of Time to Answer re #1 Complaint; BJA Masonry, LLC answer due 1/31/2022; Carol Borradaile answer due 1/31/2022; Gilbert C. Borradaile answer due 1/31/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson on 1/4/2022. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 10 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by BJA Masonry, LLC, Carol Borradaile, Gilbert C. Borradaile (Sparks, Lisa) |
| Filing 9 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by BJA Masonry, LLC, Carol Borradaile, Gilbert C. Borradaile (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sparks, Lisa) |
|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson on 1/4/2022. (ols, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 6 -PER COUNSEL, FILED IN ERROR. TO BE REFILED- Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re #1 Complaint, by BJA Masonry, LLC, Carol Borradaile, Gilbert C. Borradaile (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Sparks, Lisa) Modified on 1/4/2022 (ols, Deputy Clerk). |
| Deficiency Notice for BJA Masonry, LLC -- Your Local Rule 103.3 disclosure statement has not been filed. The Statement must be filed by 1/11/2022 (ols, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued 21 days as to BJA Masonry, LLC, Carol Borradaile and Gilbert C. Borradaile.(slss, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 3
Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson on 12/1/2021. (slss, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson. Daniel J. Weeks or counsel for Daniel J. Weeks are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 12/15/2021. (slss, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Collective Action against All Defendants ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9631808.), filed by Daniel J. Weeks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons BJA Masonry, LLC, #3 Summons Gilbert C. Borradaile, #4 Summons Carol Borradaile)(Gardiner, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
