Hamilton v. DPSCS et al
| Jahi Rashad Hamilton |
| S. Causey, Lee Ann Taylor, Ernest Uzicanin, Marie Desir, DPSCS, Ruth Campbell, Asresahegn Getachew, Jennifer L. Adrion, Van Warrington, George Welch, Sharon Owens, Sandra Boettinger and Stephanie Cyran |
| 1:2024cv02426 |
| August 21, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paula Xinis |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff 28 days to file an amended complaint as directed; DIRECTING Clerk mail to Plaintiff this Order, a copy of the original Complaint, and a blank civil rights complaint form with included instructions. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 9/25/2024. (c/m 9/26) (hmls, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 New Case Notification Letter sent to Jahi Rashad Hamilton. (c/m 8/27/24- ar6s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jahi Rashad Hamilton(ar6s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jennifer L. Adrion, Sandra Boettinger, Ruth Campbell, S. Causey, Stephanie Cyran, DPSCS, Marie Desir, Asresahegn Getachew, Sharon Owens, Lee Ann Taylor, Ernest Uzicanin, Van Warrington, George Welch, filed by Jahi Rashad Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(ar6s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
