Nobles v. United States of America
Tammy Nobles |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
1:2024cv02913 |
October 7, 2024 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland |
J Mark Coulson |
Other Statutory Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #2 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Brian E. Claypool. Directing attorney Brian E. Claypool to register for pro hac vice filing in the District of Maryland through PACER at https://pacer.uscourts.gov/ if attorney has not already done so. The Pro Hac Vice option must be selected when registering. Signed by Clerk on 10/9/2024. (mh4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson. Tammy Nobles or counsel for Tammy Nobles are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 10/22/2024. (av4s, Deputy Clerk) |
![]() |
Filing 4 Summons Issued 60 days as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (av4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Case Assigned to Magistrate Judge J. Mark Coulson. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by ESTATE OF Kayla Hamilton, Tammy Nobles SUMMONS TO THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Cox, Daniel) |
Filing 2 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for BRIAN E. CLAYPOOL (Filing fee $100, receipt number AMDDC-11535041.) by ESTATE OF Kayla Hamilton, Tammy Nobles(Cox, Daniel) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES UNDER THE FEDERAL TORT CLAIMS ACT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11535036.), filed by Tammy Nobles, ESTATE OF Kayla Hamilton. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet CIVIL COVER SHEET)(Cox, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Nobles v. United States of America | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Tammy Nobles | |
Represented By: | Brian E. Claypool |
Represented By: | Daniel Lewis Cox |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.