Williams v. Dudek
| Ashley Jenee Williams |
| Leland Dudek |
| Ssaogcomms SSA Notify |
| 1:2025cv00902 |
| March 19, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Charles D Austin |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 19, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER: In accordance with 28 USC 636(c), all parties have voluntarily consented to have Magistrate Judge Charles D. Austin conduct all further proceedings in this case, including trial and entry of final judgment, and conduct all post-judgment proceedings, with direct review by the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, if an appeal is filed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles D. Austin on 3/19/2025. (bg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Kelly M Marzullo on behalf of Leland Dudek. A certified copy of the transcript of the record is due on 5/19/2025 unless otherwise ordered. (bg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 3 Consent to Magistrate Judge (Demuth, Lawrence) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Ashley Jenee Williams (Demuth, Lawrence) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Leland Dudek, filed by Ashley Jenee Williams. (Attachments: #1 BK#)(Demuth, Lawrence) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
