EEOC v. Blockbuster Inc.
EEOC |
Blockbuster Inc. |
8:2007cv02612 |
September 26, 2007 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Greenbelt Office |
Montgomery |
Roger W Titus |
Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 131 CONSENT JUDGMENT is awarded directly to the EEOC claimants in this action in the total amount of $2,328,667.85 shich shall be allocated to the indifidual claimants ; this Judgment shall not be construed to alter any creditor claim priorities in the Bankruptcy Case; Each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 12/13/2011. (0.11%) (ranks, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 130 Joint MOTION to Approve Consent Judgment by EEOC Responses due by 12/30/2011 (Attachments: # 1 Consent Judgment)(Phillips, Ronald) |
Filing 106 Exhibit 26 to EEOC's Response in Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment by EEOC re 105 Response in Opposition to Motion,,, (Phillips, Ronald) Modified on 4/22/2010 (rank, Deputy Clerk).Unsealed per Order dated 4/20/2010 #111 |
Filing 105 RESPONSE in Opposition re 100 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support of Summary Judgment filed by EEOC. Replies due by 4/19/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exb. 1, # 2 Exhibit Exb. 2, # 3 Exhibit Exb. 3, # 4 Exhibit Exb. 4, # 5 Exhibit Exb. 5, # 6 Exhibit Exb. 6, # 7 Exhibit Exb. 7, # 8 Exhibit Exb. 8, # 9 Exhibit Exb. 9, # 10 Exhibit Exb. 10, # 11 Exhibit Exb. 11, # 12 Exhibit Exb. 12, # 13 Exhibit Exb. 13, # 14 Exhibit Exb. 14, # 15 Exhibit Exb. 15, # 16 Exhibit Exb. 16, # 17 Exhibit Exb. 17, # 18 Exhibit Exb. 18, # 19 Exhibit Exb. 19, # 20 Exhibit Exb. 20, # 21 Exhibit Exb. 21, # 22 Exhibit Exb. 22, # 23 Exhibit Exb. 23, # 24 Exhibit Exb. 24, # 25 Exhibit Exb. 25, # 26 Exhibit Exb. 27, # 27 Exhibit Exb. 28, # 28 Exhibit Exb. 29)(Phillips, Ronald) |
Filing 100 MOTION for Summary Judgment and Brief in Support of Summary Judgment by Blockbuster Inc. Responses due by 3/25/2010 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H, # 9 Exhibit I, # 10 Exhibit J, # 11 Exhibit K, # 12 Exhibit L, # 13 Exhibit M, # 14 Exhibit N, # 15 Exhibit O, # 16 Exhibit P, # 17 Exhibit Q, # 18 Exhibit R, # 19 Exhibit S, # 20 Exhibit T, # 21 Exhibit U, # 22 Exhibit V, # 23 Exhibit W, # 24 Exhibit X, # 25 Exhibit Y1, # 26 Exhibit Y2, # 27 Exhibit Y3, # 28 Exhibit Y4, # 29 Exhibit Y5, # 30 Exhibit Y6, # 31 Exhibit Y7, # 32 Exhibit Y8, # 33 Exhibit Y9, # 34 Exhibit Y10, # 35 Exhibit Y11, # 36 Exhibit Y12)(Keiller, Chaka) Modified on 3/10/2010 (rank, Deputy Clerk).(Hard Copy rec'd 3/10/2010 rk) |
Filing 86 ORDER granting 50 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings; denying as MOOT 69 and 70 Motion for Entry of Default; granting 72 Motion to Dismiss; denying as MOOT 73 Motion for Extension of Time to Complete Discovery, directing the remaining parties to contact the chambers of Magistrate Judge Charles Day to schedule further mediation in this matter. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 6/29/09. (rank, Deputy Clerk) Modified on 6/30/2009 to correct clerical error (rank, Deputy Clerk). |
Filing 52 FOURTH PARTY COMPLAINT against Express Personnel, Kevin Andrew Lenear, Lenco, Inc., filed by Venturi Staffing Partners.(Hemmendinger, Eric) |
Filing 49 ANSWER to 38 Third Party Complaint by Venturi Staffing Partners. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit No. 1)(Hemmendinger, Eric) |
Filing 40 ANSWER to 35 Amended Complaint by Blockbuster Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Redline)(Quamie, Lexer) |
Filing 38 THIRD PARTY COMPLAINT against Venturi Staffing Partners, filed by Blockbuster Inc..(Quamie, Lexer) |
Filing 37 ORDER Denying 15 MOTION for Joinder and Motion for Leave to File Third-Party Complaint to the extent that it seeks to join additional parties and granting to the extent it requests leave to file a third-p0arty complaint against Venturi Staffing Partners filed by Blockbuster Inc.,that the modification of the Scheduing Order by 14 and 30 Orders is vacted and denying as Moot 33 Joint MOTION to Stay filed by EEOC, and directing Venturi Staffing Partners to file any thid-party complaint should it choose to do so, with the filing of any responsive pleading to defendant Bloockbuter's third-party complaint. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 11/10/08. (rank, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 28 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE/CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. Signed by Judge Roger W Titus on 7/29/2008. (kn, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to Complaint by Blockbuster Inc..(Speights, Grace) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Blockbuster Inc., filed by EEOC. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(raf, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: EEOC v. Blockbuster Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: EEOC | |
Represented By: | Debra Michele Lawrence |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Blockbuster Inc. | |
Represented By: | Marc Aaron Fuller |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.