National Electrical Benefit Fund et al v. MMC Directional Boring

Plaintiff: National Electrical Benefit Fund and National Electrical Annuity Plan
Defendant: MMC Directional Boring
Case Number: 8:2013cv00170
Filed: January 16, 2013
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Montgomery
Presiding Judge: Deborah K. Chasanow
Referring Judge: Jillyn K Schulze
Nature of Suit: Labor: E.R.I.S.A.
Cause of Action: 29:1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Jury Demanded By: None

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: National Electrical Benefit Fund et al v. MMC Directional Boring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: National Electrical Benefit Fund
Represented By: Jennifer Bush Hawkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: National Electrical Annuity Plan
Represented By: Jennifer Bush Hawkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MMC Directional Boring
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.