Broadvox-CLEC, LLC v. AT&T Corp. et al
Plaintiff:
Broadvox-CLEC, LLC
Defendant:
AT&T Corp., Teleport Communications Group, Inc., SBC Long Distance, LLC, AT&T Communications of Indiana, G.P., AT&T Communications of New York, Inc. and AT&T Communications of Washington, D.C., Inc.
Case Number:
8:2013cv01130
Filed:
April 16, 2013
Court:
Maryland District Court
Office:
Greenbelt Office
County:
Prince George's
Presiding Judge:
Paul W. Grimm
Nature of Suit:
Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action:
28:1331 Fed. Question
Jury Demanded By:
None
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Date Filed | # | Document Text |
|---|---|---|
| September 27, 2016 | 163 |
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 122 MOTION for Reconsideration re 119 Memorandum Opinion filed by Broadvox-CLEC, LLC. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/27/2016. (aos, Deputy Clerk)
|
| April 10, 2015 | 67 |
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying as moot 64 MOTION re 40 Order on Motion to Dismiss, Requesting the Court to Establish a Summary Judgment Briefing Schedule; granting 56 Consent MOTION to Seal Broadvox's Brief on Primary Jurisdiction; directing parties to submit a revised scheduling order. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 4/10/2015. (aos, Deputy Clerk)
|
| July 2, 2014 | 41 |
MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 7/2/2014. (jf2, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
