Essel v. USA - 2255
Petitioner: Paul Kobina Essel
Respondent: USA - 2255
Case Number: 8:2015cv01392
Filed: May 15, 2015
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Paul W. Grimm
Nature of Suit: Motions to Vacate Sentence
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2255
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
April 13, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 81 Motion to Vacate (2255) as to Paul Kobina Essel (1); denying 86 Motion to Vacate as to Paul Kobina Essel (1); denying 90 PETITION/MOTION for Relief of Restitution as to Paul Kobina Essel IN CRIMINAL CASE NO. 13-259. The Clerk SHALL CLOSE Civil Case No. PWG-15-1392. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 4/13/2016. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk) (c/m 4.13.16)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Essel v. USA - 2255
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Paul Kobina Essel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA - 2255
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?