Pugh v. Board of Education Montgomery County, MD
Plaintiff: Adrian D. Pugh
Defendant: Board of Education Montgomery County, MD
Case Number: 8:2016cv03816
Filed: November 28, 2016
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: 88888
Presiding Judge: Deborah K. Chasanow
Nature of Suit: Employment
Cause of Action: 42:2000
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
December 6, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 33 MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Plaintiff 12/6/17 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 12/6/2017. (sat, Chambers)
April 12, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 11 MEMORANDUM OPINION (c/m to Plaintiff 4/12/17 sat). Signed by Judge Deborah K. Chasanow on 4/12/2017. (sat, Chambers)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pugh v. Board of Education Montgomery County, MD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adrian D. Pugh
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Board of Education Montgomery County, MD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?