Redemption Community Church v. City of Laurel, Maryland

Plaintiff: Redemption Community Church
Defendant: City of Laurel, Maryland
Case Number: 8:2018cv00411
Filed: February 9, 2018
Court: Maryland District Court
Office: Greenbelt Office
County: Prince George's
Presiding Judge: Peter J. Messitte
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42:1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed#Document Text
August 8, 2018 42 Opinion or Order of the Court MEMORANDUM OPINION. Signed by Judge Peter J. Messitte on 8/8/2018. (aos, Deputy Clerk)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Redemption Community Church v. City of Laurel, Maryland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Redemption Community Church
Represented By: John R Garza
Represented By: Christiana M Holcomb
Represented By: Kyle McCutcheon
Represented By: Erik W Stanley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Laurel, Maryland
Represented By: Kevin Bock Karpinski
Represented By: Sandra D Lee
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?