Washburn v. Driscoll, Jr. et al
| Choo Washburn |
| David Driscoll, Jr. and Robert McCarthy |
| 8:2018cv02565 |
| August 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paul W Grimm |
| Civil Rights: Accomodations |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Return Document Letter to Choo Washburn. (Attachments: #1 first page of returned document)(kns, Deputy Clerk)(c/h/d 8/29/18) |
Filing 4
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in Forma Pauperis and DISMISSING Complaint. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/28/2018. (kns, Deputy Clerk)(c/m 8/28/18)
|
|
Filing 3
LETTER ORDER regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 8/21/2018. (c/m 8/21/2018 tds, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Choo Washburn (tds, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against David Driscoll, Jr., Robert McCarthy, filed by Choo Washburn. (Attachments: #1 REF. #1, #2 REF. #2, #3 REF. #3, #4 REF. #4, #5 REF. #5, #6 REF. #6, #7 REF. #7, #8 REF. #8, #9 REF. #9, #10 REF. #10, #11 REF. #11, #12 REF. #13, #13 REF. #14, #14 REF. #15, #15 REF. #16, #16 REF. #17, #17 REF. #18, #18 REF. #19, #19 REF. #20, #20 REF. #21, #21 REF. #22, #22 REF. #23, #23 REF. #24, #24 Proposed Order, #25 Civil Cover Sheet, #26 Summonses) (There is no REF. #12) (tds, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
