Ridgell v. St. Mary's County, Maryland
| Desiree A. Ridgell |
| St. Mary's County, Maryland |
| 8:2018cv02979 |
| September 27, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Jarrod Hazel |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
LETTER/ORDER Scheduling Settlement Conference for 11/28/2018 at 9:30 a.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day on 11/11/2018. (kns, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by St. Mary's County, Maryland (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Exhibit, #3 Text of Proposed Order)(Levine, Jason) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #4 Motion to Stay Pending alternative dispute resolution. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 10/15/2018. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Charles B. Day for Settlement. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 10/15/2018. (cags, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against St. Mary's County, Maryland, filed by Desiree A. Ridgell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Redline First Amended Complaint)(Greenberg, Gregg) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by St. Mary's County, Maryland (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Levine, Jason) |
| Filing 6 Correspondence re: Court's Standing Order Concerning Removal (Levine, Jason) |
|
Filing 5
Standing Order Concerning Removal. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 9/27/2018. (km4s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 Joint MOTION to Stay Pending ADR by St. Mary's County, Maryland (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Levine, Jason) |
| Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by St. Mary's County, Maryland (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.5 (Certification of Filing of State Court Papers)(km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for St. Mary's County, case number C-18-CV-18-000345. (Filing fee $400 receipt number 84637033101), filed by St. Mary's County, Maryland. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A- Notice of Removal from State Court, #3 Complaint from State Court, #4 Summons from State Court, #5 Line Entering Appearance from State Court, #6 Letter from State Court)(km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ridgell v. St. Mary's County, Maryland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Desiree A. Ridgell | |
| Represented By: | Anthony George Bizien |
| Represented By: | Gregg Cohen Greenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: St. Mary's County, Maryland | |
| Represented By: | Jason Lee Levine |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
