Pepicelli et al v. Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.
| Amberlyn Johnston and Anthony Pepicelli |
| Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. |
| 8:2018cv03653 |
| November 28, 2018 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paul W Grimm |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 6, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #15 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Michael McLaren. Directing attorney Michael McLaren to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 1/25/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 16 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #14 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of John W Campbell. Attorney John W Campbell will receive a separate email with the previously issued CM/ECF login and password. Signed by Clerk on 1/25/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Michael C. McLaren (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-7801224.) by Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. (Blumberg, Peter) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for John W. Campbell (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-7801186.) by Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. (Blumberg, Peter) |
| Filing 13 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. (Blumberg, Peter) |
| Filing 12 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Fedex Corporate Services, Inc..(Blumberg, Peter) |
Filing 11
PAPERLESS ORDER granting #10 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. answer due 1/23/2019.. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/21/18. (lmys, Chambers)
|
| Filing 10 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer by Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Proposed Order)(Blumberg, Peter) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Anthony Pepicelli, Amberlyn Johnston. Fedex Corporate Services, Inc. served on 12/5/2018, answer due 12/26/2018.(Mason, Gary) |
| Filing 8 QC NOTICE: #7 Affidavit of Service filed by Anthony Pepicelli, Amberlyn Johnston was filed incorrectly. **Please re-file documents by selecting Service of Process Summons Returned Executed. It has been noted as FILED IN ERROR, and the document link has been disabled. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 7 (FILED IN ERROR) AFFIDAVIT of Service for Class Action Complaint and Summons served on Samantha Sutton on 12/05/2018, filed by Amberlyn Johnston, Anthony Pepicelli.(Mason, Gary) Modified on 12/17/2018 (jf3s, Deputy Clerk). |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued 21 days as to Fedex Corporate Services, Inc.(jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 5
Letter Order Regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 11/29/2018. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Amberlyn Johnston, Anthony Pepicelli re #1 Complaint Proposed Summons (Mason, Gary) |
| Filing 3 QC NOTICE: #1 Complaint filed by Anthony Pepicelli and Amberlyn Johnston was filed with the following attachment missing - Proposed Summons. To correct this problem, file Proposed Summons using the event Notice (Other) and link Proposed Summons to #1 Complaint. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Supplemental to #1 Complaint filed by Amberlyn Johnston, Anthony Pepicelli Civil Cover Sheet (Mason, Gary) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt #: 0416-7695605 against Fedex Corporate Services, Inc., filed by Anthony Pepicelli, Amberlyn Johnston.(Mason, Gary) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
