Membreno v. Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC et al
Diana Membreno |
Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC, Jackmont Administrative Services, LLC, TGI Friday's and Jackmont Hospitality, Inc. |
8:2019cv00369 |
February 6, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Paula Xinis |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 RESPONSE in Opposition re #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Diana Membreno.(Adelman, Andrew) |
Filing 21 MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Diana Membreno (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Proposed Order)(Adelman, Andrew) |
Filing 20 PAPERLESS ORDER Denying #14 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply; Plaintiff's response to #12 Motion to Dismiss is due on or before Fourteen (14) days from the date of this Order. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 3/14/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 19 RESPONSE in Opposition re #13 MOTION to Remand to State Court filed by Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC, Jackmont Administrative Services, LLC, Jackmont Hospitality, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Proof of Inadvertence))(Mason, Erica) |
Filing 18 Local Rule DEFENDANTS STATEMENT PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER ON REMOVAL(Mason, Erica) |
Filing 17 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Jackmont Hospitality, Inc. (Mason, Erica) |
Filing 16 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Jackmont Administrative Services, LLC (Mason, Erica) |
Filing 15 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC (Mason, Erica) |
Filing 14 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Diana Membreno (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Adelman, Andrew) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Diana Membreno (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Adelman, Andrew) |
Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim by Jackmont Administrative Services, LLC, Jackmont Hospitality, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Plaintiff's EEOC Charge), #2 Exhibit B (Unpublished MD Opinion (Falanga)), #3 Exhibit C (Business Entity Search Results for Defendants on Maryland.gov website))(Friedman, Jason) |
Filing 11 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Diana Membreno (Adelman, Andrew) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Adelman on behalf of Diana Membreno (Adelman, Andrew) |
Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #7 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Erica Mason. Directing attorney Erica Mason to register online for CM/ECF at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-registration. Signed by Clerk on 2/12/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 8 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC (Friedman, Jason) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Erica V. Mason (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-7830952.) by Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC, Jackmont Administrative Services, LLC, Jackmont Hospitality, Inc.(Friedman, Jason) |
Filing 6 Supplemental to #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC, Jackmont Administrative Services, LLC, Jackmont Hospitality, Inc. Montgomery County, Maryland Circuit Court Complaint & Initial Case Filings (Attachments: #1 Plaintiff's Civil Non-Domestic Case Information Report, #2 Writ of Summons, #3 Request for Spoken Language Interpreter, #4 Letter re Notice of New Case Number, #5 Scheduling Notice and Order of Court, #6 Scheduling Order, #7 Order for Mandatory Settlement Conference, #8 Civil Non-Domestic Case Information Report, #9 Motion for Special Admission of Out of State Attorney Andrew M. Adelman, #10 Motion for Special Admission of Out of State Attorney Roshni C. Shikari)(Friedman, Jason) |
Filing 5 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC, Jackmont Administrative Services, LLC, Jackmont Hospitality, Inc. was filed incorrectly. Each attachment must be specifically labeled (i.e. complaint, summons, etc). Please refile each attachment using the "Other Documents" category, select the "Supplemental" event, and link filing to #1 Notice of Removal. The first labeled attachment can be the main document and the other labeled documents as separate attachments. File any pending motions as separate docket entries. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 Standing Order Concerning Removal re #1 Notice of Removal,, filed by Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC, Jackmont Administrative Services, LLC, Jackmont Hospitality, Inc.. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 2/7/2019. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
Case assigned to Judge Paula Xinis. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC (Friedman, Jason) |
Filing 2 Defendant Atlanta Restuarant Partners, LLC'S ANSWER to Complaint & Affirmative Defenses by Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC.(Friedman, Jason) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL TO FEDERAL COURT from Circuit Court for Montgomery County, Maryland, case number 460995-V. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-7827228), filed by Atlanta Restaurant Partners, LLC, Jackmont Administrative Services, LLC, Jackmont Hospitality, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A (Complaint, Initial Case Filings), #2 Exhibit B (Motions for Special Admission), #3 Exhibit C (Notice of Removal to Circuit Court), #4 Exhibit D (Notice of Removal to Plaintiff), #5 Exhibit E (Federal Civil Action Cover Sheet))(Friedman, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.