Houck v. Department of Corrections et al
| James E. Hauck and James E. Houck |
| Warden at WCI and Department of Corrections |
| 8:2019cv01118 |
| April 15, 2019 |
| U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Jarrod Hazel |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 bv |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 1, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER denying #2 Motion to Leave in Forma Pauperis; DISMISSING CASE without prejudice; directing the Clerk to close this case. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 7/1/2019. (c/m 7/3/19 nu, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 4 Supplemental ( Motion for complaint for all relief) to #1 Complaint filed by James E. Houck (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nu, Deputy Clerk) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER directing the Clerk to Correct the spelling of Plaintiff's Name on the docket (to Houck); and granting Plaintiff 28 days from the date of this Order to Supplement the #1 Complaint as directed, and forewarning Plaintiff that if he fails to do so this Case will be dismissed without further notice unless he has paid the filing fee. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 5/2/2019. (c/m 5/3/2019 tds, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by James E. Hauck (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nu, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Department of Corrections, Warden at WCI, filed by James E. Hauck. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(nu, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
