Hinch v. Saul
Plaintiff: Clayton Hinch and Clayton W. Hinch
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Interested Party: SSA Notify
Case Number: 8:2019cv01855
Filed: June 24, 2019
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Stephanie A Gallagher
Referring Judge: George Jarrod Hazel
Nature of Suit: Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 405
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 29, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2019 Filing 8 PAPERLESS ORDER granting #3 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of David F Chermol. Directing attorney David F Chermol to use the attorney's existing CM/ECF login and password previously issued in this Court. The account password can be reset at http://www.mdd.uscourts.gov/electronic-case-filing-password-reset. Signed by Clerk on 6/28/2019. (srd, Deputy Clerk)
June 26, 2019 Filing 7 Summons Issued 60 days as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (km4s, Deputy Clerk)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; Directing Plaintiff's counsel to effectuate service of summons and complaint on Defendant. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 6/26/2019. (km4s, Deputy Clerk)
June 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge Stephanie A. Gallagher for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 6/26/2019. (jnls, Deputy Clerk)
June 24, 2019 Filing 4 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Magistrate Judge by Vickie Leduc on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (km4s, Deputy Clerk)
June 24, 2019 Filing 3 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for David F. Chermol (Filing fee $100, receipt number 0416-8088372.) by Clayton Hinch(Shea, Stephen)
June 24, 2019 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Clayton Hinch(Shea, Stephen)
June 24, 2019 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Clayton Hinch. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons)(Shea, Stephen)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hinch v. Saul
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Andrew M. Saul
Represented By: Vickie LeDuc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clayton Hinch
Represented By: Stephen F Shea
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Clayton W. Hinch
Represented By: Stephen F Shea
Represented By: David F Chermol
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: SSA Notify
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?