Johnson v. Lockheed Martin Corporation
| Carlos Johnson |
| Lockheed Martin Corporation |
| 8:2019cv01996 |
| July 8, 2019 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Theodore D Chuang |
| Gina L Simms |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 24, 2019. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER. Signed by Judge Theodore D. Chuang on 7/24/2019. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Case Reassigned to Judge Theodore D. Chuang. Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY re: #5 Consent to Magistrate Judge. Carlos Johnson must correct the following error(s):**Pursuant to the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures, declination forms are to be filed with the event 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge located in Other Filings >Other Documents >25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 5 (FILED IN ERROR) Consent to Magistrate Judge (Chambers, Darrell) Modified on 7/22/2019 (heps, Deputy Clerk). |
|
Filing 4
Case Management Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Gina L Simms on 7/9/2019. (km4s, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Gina L. Simms. Carlos Johnson or counsel for Carlos Johnson are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Pilot Project Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2018-04, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 7/23/2019. (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Lockheed Martin Corporation. (km4s, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Carlos Johnson ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8111166.), filed by Carlos Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Chambers, Darrell) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Johnson v. Lockheed Martin Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lockheed Martin Corporation | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Carlos Johnson | |
| Represented By: | Darrell Chambers |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
