Cade v. O'Sullivan, Esq et al
Eric Cade |
Laura H.G. O'Sullivan, Esq and McCabe, Weisberg, & Conway, LLC |
8:2019cv03260 |
November 12, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
George Jarrod Hazel |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER denying ECF #3 MOTION to Remove a Civil Case to Federal Court by Eric Cade; DISMISSING CASE without prejudice; Case is CLOSED. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 12/23/2019. (c/m 1/9/2020 ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying #2 MOTION for Non - Judicial Temporary Restraining Order - Permanent Injunction & Demand for an Emergency Hearing. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 11/13/2019. (c/m ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 NOTICE by Eric Cade re #1 Complaint, (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 MOTION Remove a Civil Case to Federal Court by Eric Cade (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Non - Judicial Temporary Restraining Order - Permanent Injunction & Demand for an Emergency Hearing by Eric Cade (Attachments: #1 Verification)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against McCabe, Weisberg, & Conway, LLC, Laura H.G. O'Sullivan, Esq ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 84637035354.), filed by Eric Cade. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.