Gibson v. Saul
Sheila Katherine Gibson |
Andrew M. Saul |
SSA Notify |
8:2019cv03549 |
December 13, 2019 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Deborah L. Boardman |
George Jarrod Hazel |
Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Case Reassigned to Judge George Jarrod Hazel. Judge Richard D. Bennett no longer assigned to the case. (kns, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 6 Paperless order referring case to Magistrate Judge Deborah L. Boardman for pretrial management and report and recommendations pursuant to Standing Order 2014-01. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 12/18/2019. (cags, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued 60 days as to Andrew M. Saul, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General(kw2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 4 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Richard D. Bennett on 12/16/2019. (kw2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 PAPERLESS NOTICE of Appearance and Consent to Proceed Before Magistrate Judge by Vickie LeDuc on behalf of Andrew M. Saul (kw2s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Sheila Katherine Gibson(Murahari, Arjun) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Andrew M. Saul, filed by Sheila Katherine Gibson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Murahari, Arjun) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.