Nash v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
Plaintiff: Tina Sue Nash
Defendant: Montgomery County, Maryland and Linda Herman
Case Number: 8:2020cv01138
Filed: May 4, 2020
Court: US District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: George Jarrod Hazel
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28:1441
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 31, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 4, 2020 Filing 6 Local Rule 103.5(a) Compliance (Attachments: #1 Attachment Certified Copy of Court Record 479244V)(Haggerty, Patricia)
May 4, 2020 Filing 5 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Montgomery County, Maryland (Haggerty, Patricia)
May 4, 2020 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Lynn Pankiewicz on behalf of All Defendants (Pankiewicz, Stephanie)
May 4, 2020 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia Lisehora Kane on behalf of All Defendants (Kane, Patricia)
May 4, 2020 Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Patricia Victoria Haggerty on behalf of All Defendants (Haggerty, Patricia)
May 4, 2020 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Montgomery County, MD, case number 479244V. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8638055), filed by Montgomery County, Maryland, Linda Herman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Attachment Attorney Info, #3 Attachment Complaint & Jury Demand, #4 Attachment Plaintiff's Information Sheet, #5 Attachment Line Entering Appearance of Counsel for Plaintiff, #6 Attachment Notice of Scheduling Hearing and Order of Court-Track 4, #7 Attachment Notice of New Case Number, #8 Attachment Summons-Montgomery County, #9 Attachment Summons-Linda Herman, #10 Attachment Consent Motion to Extend Time to File A Responsive Pleading to the Complaint, #11 Attachment Notice of Existing Schedule (Kane), #12 Attachment Notice of Existing Schedule (Haggerty), #13 Attachment Notice of Existing Schedule (Pankiewicz), #14 Attachment Affidavit of Service on Summons (Herman), #15 Attachment Affidavit of Service on Summons (Montgomery County), #16 Attachment Line Requesting Certified Copy of Entire Court Record, #17 Attachment Certified Copy of Entire Court Record)(Haggerty, Patricia)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Nash v. Montgomery County, Maryland et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Sue Nash
Represented By: Bernard William Semler, II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Montgomery County, Maryland
Represented By: Patricia Lisehora Kane
Represented By: Stephanie Lynn Pankiewicz
Represented By: Patricia Victoria Haggerty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Linda Herman
Represented By: Patricia Lisehora Kane
Represented By: Stephanie Lynn Pankiewicz
Represented By: Patricia Victoria Haggerty
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?