Espino v. P&S Transportation LLC
| Romy D Espino |
| P&S Transportation LLC |
| 8:2020cv02585 |
| September 8, 2020 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Paul W Grimm |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 STATE COURT COMPLAINT against P&S Transportation LLC, filed by Romy D Espino.(heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 9 Correspondence re: Statement Concerning Removal (Toohey, Patrick) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE by P&S Transportation LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, Corrected Exhibit B to Removal (Toohey, Patrick) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by P&S Transportation LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, Amended 103.5 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A to Amended 103.5)(Toohey, Patrick) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by P&S Transportation LLC re #1 Notice of Removal, filed in State Court (Toohey, Patrick) |
Filing 5
LETTER ORDER Regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/9/2020. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order Concerning Removal re #1 Notice of Removal, filed by P&S Transportation LLC. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 9/9/2020. (heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
| Filing 3 QC NOTICE: #1 Notice of Removal, filed by P&S Transportation LLC was filed incorrectly. **The following attachments or exhibits are missing - State Court Documents. To correct this problem, file State Court Documents using the event Notice (Other) and link State Court Documents to #1 Notice of Removal. Each attachment must be specifically labeled (i.e. complaint, summons, etc). The first labeled attachment can be the main document and the other labeled documents as separate attachments. File any pending motions as separate docket entries. (heps, Deputy Clerk) |
| Filing 2 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by P&S Transportation LLC identifying Corporate Parent P&S Transportation LLC for P&S Transportation LLC.(Toohey, Patrick) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Prince George's County, case number CAL 19 33652. ( Filing fee $ 400 receipt number 0416-8849063), filed by P&S Transportation LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A to Notice of Removal, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B to Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Attachment Certificate of Copy of Filing of Notice of Removal in State Court, #5 Attachment 103.5 Certificate)(Toohey, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Espino v. P&S Transportation LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: P&S Transportation LLC | |
| Represented By: | Patrick Flynn Toohey |
| Represented By: | Andrew T Stephenson |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Romy D Espino | |
| Represented By: | Ivonne Corsino Lindley |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
