Mason v. Netcom Technologies, Inc.
samuel mason |
Netcom Technologies, Inc. |
8:2020cv03558 |
December 8, 2020 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Paul W Grimm |
Other Statutes: False Claims Act |
31 U.S.C. ยง 3729 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim[Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Amended Complaint] by Netcom Technologies, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support)(Schneider, Jeremy) |
Filing 10 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Netcom Technologies, Inc., filed by Samuel Mason. (Attachments: #1 Attachment Redlined Version of Amended Complaint)(Ray, James) |
Filing 9 PAPERLESS ORDER memorializing 1/12/2021 pre-motion telephone conference. Plaintiff may file an amended complaint by 1/18/21. Defendant may file its motion to dismiss by 2/1/21; plaintiff shall file a response by 2/22/21 and defendant a reply by 3/8/21. The Court requests that the parties keep their briefs succinct: unless otherwise ordered by the Court, the motion and response shall not exceed 25 pages, and the reply 15 pages, exclusive of tables and exhibits. To facilitate the Courts review, the parties are further directed to highlight relevant portions of any exhibits attached to their briefs. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 1/12/2021. (jc6s, Chambers) |
Filing 8 LETTER ORDER scheduling a pre-motion telephone conference call on January 12, 2021 at 2:30 pm. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 1/5/2021. (ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 7 Correspondence re: Netcom's intent to file a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint - Per December 9, 2020 Letter Order Regarding the Filing of Motions (Schneider, Jeremy) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeremy Schneider on behalf of Netcom Technologies, Inc. (Schneider, Jeremy) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Matthew Frederick Nieman on behalf of Netcom Technologies, Inc. (Nieman, Matthew) |
Filing 4 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Samuel Mason. Netcom Technologies, Inc. served on 12/9/2020, answer due 12/30/2020.(Ray, James) |
Filing 3 LETTER ORDER Regarding the Filing of Motions. Signed by Judge Paul W. Grimm on 12/9/2020. (ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Summons Issued 21 days as to Netcom Technologies, Inc..(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Netcom Technologies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9002512.), filed by samuel mason. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons)(Ray, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Mason v. Netcom Technologies, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Netcom Technologies, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Jeremy Schneider |
Represented By: | Matthew Frederick Nieman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: samuel mason | |
Represented By: | James Martin Ray, II |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.