Leonard v. US Fertility, LLC
Shelly A. Leonard |
US Fertility LLC |
8:2021cv01783 |
July 19, 2021 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
Peter J Messitte |
Personal Property: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1986 |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
THIS IS A CONSOLIDATED CASE. PLEASE DO NOT ELECTRONICALLY FILE OR SPREAD TEXT IN THIS CASE. ALL SUBSEQUENT PLEADINGS ARE TO BE ELECTRONICALLY FILED ONLY IN THE LEAD CASE (21-cv-00299-PJM). (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Cases associated: Create association to 8:21-cv-00299-PJM. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 18 Transfer Notification Letter (c/m 7/22/2021 - dg3s, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 17 Case transferred in from District of New York Eastern; Case Number 2:21-cv-00835. Original file certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. |
![]() |
Filing 15 Proposed Pretrial Order Proposed Order Transferring Case by US Fertility, LLC (Haggerty, Richard) |
Case transferred to District of Maryland. Original file, certified copy of transfer order, and docket sheet sent. ALL FILINGS ARE TO BE MADE IN THE TRANSFER COURT, DO NOT DOCKET TO THIS CASE. (Coleman, Laurie) |
Filing 14 MINUTE ENTRY for proceedings held before Judge Joan M. Azrack: Civil Cause for PRE-MOTION CONFERENCE held on 7/13/2021. Counsel for Plaintiff: Patrick Almonrode. Counsel for Defendant: Claudia McCarron, Richard Haggerty. Case called. Counsel present for all sides. Parties to file a proposed order re transfer of case to USDC-MD by 7/16/2021. (Coleman, Laurie) |
![]() |
Filing 13 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Claudia D. McCarron Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-14643145. by US Fertility, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit in Support of Pro Hac Vice Motion, #2 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #3 Proposed Order) (McCarron, Claudia) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick Sidney Almonrode on behalf of Shelly A. Leonard (aty to be noticed) (Almonrode, Patrick) |
Filing 11 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting (Brown, Jason) |
Filing 10 Letter Requesting Pre-Motion Conference regarding Proposed Motion to Transfer and/or Stay by US Fertility, LLC (Haggerty, Richard) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 8 Corporate Disclosure Statement by US Fertility, LLC identifying Corporate Parent US Fertility Holdings, LLC for US Fertility, LLC. (Haggerty, Richard) |
Filing 7 Letter in Response to Defendant's Letter Requesting Pre-Motion Conference by Shelly A. Leonard (Brown, Jason) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard M. Haggerty on behalf of US Fertility, LLC (aty to be noticed) (Haggerty, Richard) |
Filing 5 Letter Requesting Pre-Motion Conference Regarding Proposed Motion to Dismiss by US Fertility, LLC (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Haggerty, Richard) Modified on 4/29/2021 to change event type to motion (Coleman, Laurie). |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to US Fertility, LLC. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 3 In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: #http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 2 This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/17/2021: #1 Additional Corrections) (Rodin, Deanna). |
Case Assigned to Judge Joan M. Azrack and Magistrate Judge Arlene R. Lindsay. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our #website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Rodin, Deanna) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $402, receipt number ANYEDC-14151579, Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes, filed by Shelly A. Leonard. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Proposed Summons, #3 Exhibit A) (Brown, Jason) Modified on 2/17/2021 (Rodin, Deanna). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Leonard v. US Fertility, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Shelly A. Leonard | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: US Fertility LLC | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.