Brown v. Bank of America, National Association
| Gloria A. Brown |
| Bank of America, National Association |
| 8:2021cv02334 |
| September 13, 2021 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| Deborah K Chasanow |
| Paula Xinis |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time. Plaintiff's Response to #6 MOTION to Dismiss is extended to November 22, 2021. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 11/4/2021. (tb2s, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 7
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #6 MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by Gloria A. Brown. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Kessler, Robin)
|
|
Filing 6
MOTION to Dismiss the Complaint by Bank of America, National Association (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support, #2 Text of Proposed Order)(Duhig, Peter)
|
|
Filing 5
PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING #4 Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's Answer or otherwise Response to the Complaint is extended to October 20, 2021. Signed by Judge Paula Xinis on 10/4/2021. (tb2s, Chambers)
|
|
Filing 4
Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #3 Complaint by Bank of America, National Association (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order)(Duhig, Peter)
|
|
Filing 3
STATE COURT COMPLAINT against Bank of America, National Association, filed by Gloria A. Brown.(dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
THE ABOVE DOCUMENTS (3) ARE COPIES OF ORIGINAL PAPERS FILED IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY, MARYLAND. (dg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Case Reassigned to Judge Paula Xinis. Judge Deborah K. Chasanow no longer assigned to the case. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Bank of America, N.A. identifying Other Affiliate Bank of America Corporation, Other Affiliate NB Holdings Corporation, Other Affiliate BANA Holding Corporation, Other Affiliate BAC North America Holding Company for Bank of America, N.A..(Duhig, Peter)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Prince George's County, case number CAL21-07675. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 0416-9489320), filed by Bank of America, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Complaint, #2 Exhibit A2 - Summons, #3 Exhibit A3 - Docket, #4 Exhibit B - Notice of Filing of Removal, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Duhig, Peter)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Brown v. Bank of America, National Association | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Gloria A. Brown | |
| Represented By: | Robin Finizio Kessler |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bank of America, National Association | |
| Represented By: | Peter J Duhig |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
