Boateng et al v. Rogers
Comfort A. Boateng and Kofi Boateng |
Richard J. Rogers |
8:2022cv00760 |
March 30, 2022 |
US District Court for the District of Maryland |
George Jarrod Hazel |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Petition for Removal- Property Damage (P.I |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 MOTION to Strike #5 MOTION to Remand or in the alternative MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #5 MOTION to Remand by Comfort A. Boateng, Kofi Boateng (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Envelope)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Remand by Richard J. Rogers (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Attachment Order)(Rogers, Richard) |
Filing 4 Local Rule 103.3 Disclosure Statement by Comfort A. Boateng, Kofi L. Boateng(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 3 Clerk's Notice of Standing Order concerning removal actions filed in this Court, which can be downloaded #here. (c/m 3/30/2022 ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 2 Removal Notification Letter to Pro Se Party (c/m 3/30/2022 ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Circuit Court for Prince George's County, case number CAE16-04391. ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 84637038284), filed by Comfort A. Boateng, Kofi Boateng. (Attachments: #1 Attachment, #2 Notice of Filing Notice of Removal, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(ybs, Deputy Clerk) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.