Lewis v. Rettig et al
| Kiesha D. Lewis |
| Charles P. Rettig, Merrick B. Garland and Matthew M. Graves |
| 8:2022cv02097 |
| August 19, 2022 |
| US District Court for the District of Maryland |
| George Jarrod Hazel |
| Tax Suits: IRS-Third Party |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7609 en IRS: Petition to serve Third-Party Summons |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
Consent to receive notice and service electronically by Kiesha D. Lewis. The Court recommends that all documents received electronically be printed or saved for future reference.(heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 3
Summons Issued 60 days as to Merrick B. Garland, Charles P. Rettig and U.S. Attorney (c/m P 10/6/2022 - mg3s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER dismissing Defendants Garland and Graves; directing Plaintiff to return to the Clerk properly completed summons forms for service on Rettig, Garland and Barron. Signed by Judge George Jarrod Hazel on 9/29/2022. (c/m 9/30/2022)(kk5s, Deputy Clerk)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Merrick B. Garland, Matthew M. Graves, Charles P. Rettig ( Filing fee $ 402 receipt number 287.), filed by Kiesha D. Lewis. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit a, #2 Exhibit b, #3 Exhibit c, #4 Exhibit d, #5 Exhibit e, #6 Exhibit f, #7 Exhibit g, #8 Exhibit h, #9 Exhibit i, #10 Civil Cover Sheet, #11 Summons)(heps, Deputy Clerk)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
