Evans v. United States of America
Plaintiff: Dushaune E. Evans
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 8:2024cv02545
Filed: September 3, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland
Presiding Judge: Ajmel Ahsen Quereshi
Nature of Suit: Other Statutory Actions
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 U.S. Defendant
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 8, 2024 Filing 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Dushaune E. Evans. United States of America served on 9/24/2024, answer due 11/25/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1_Certified Postage Receipts)(Howlette, Jordan)
September 24, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Ajmel Ahsen Quereshi on 9/24/2024. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
September 24, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE of Case Assignment. This case has been assigned to Magistrate Judge Ajmel A. Quereshi. Dushaune E. Evans or counsel for Dushaune E. Evans are required to review and comply with the Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Procedures which can be downloaded #here. Pursuant to Standing Order 2019-07, which can be downloaded #here, counsel has 14 days from the date of this notice to file their consent, or decline to consent to proceed before a U.S. Magistrate Judge which can be downloaded #here. To file your consent, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. To file your declination, go to Civil > Other Filings > Other Documents > 25 Pct Mag - Decline to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge. Failure to file a consent or declination will result in issuance of an Order to Show Cause. Please review the case management order that has been issued in this case. Magistrate Election Form due by 10/8/2024. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
September 5, 2024 Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Ajmel Ahsen Quereshi. Judge Theodore D. Chuang no longer assigned to the case. (jf3s, Deputy Clerk)
September 4, 2024 Filing 2 Summons Issued 60 days as to United States of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. (dass, Deputy Clerk)
September 4, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number AMDDC-11465220.), filed by Dushaune E Evans. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 1_Notice to USCIS re Marriage Fraud, #3 Exhibit Exhibit 2_DHS Termination Letter, #4 Summons Proposed Summons for U.S. Department of Homeland Security, #5 Summons Proposed Summons for Attorney General for United States, #6 Summons Proposed Summons for U.S. Attorney for District of Maryland)(Howlette, Jordan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Maryland District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Evans v. United States of America
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Dushaune E. Evans
Represented By: Jordan David Howlette
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?