Chao v. Balista et al
| Christina Chao |
| Moses Balista, Kathleen M. Dennehey, Kelley Ryan, Randy Azzato, Chris Tortora and Massachusetts Department of Correction |
| 1:2007cv10934 |
| May 16, 2007 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Berkshire |
| Nancy Gertner |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
200
Judge Nancy Gertner: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 182 Motion for Attorney Fees; granting 198 Motion for Attorney Fees (GAM)
|
|
Filing
199
Judge Nancy Gertner: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW NOTWITHSTANDING THE VERDICT OR FOR A NEW TRIAL entered:denying 186 Motion to Alter Judgment; denying 186 Motion for Judgment NOV; denying 186 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law; denying 186 Motion for New Trial; denying 190 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law (GAM)
|
|
Filing
148
Judge Nancy Gertner: AMENDED MEMORANDUM ISSUED TO REPLACE 3/18/11 VERSION. TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS HAVE BEEN CORRECTED.(MacDonald, Gail)
|
|
Filing
133
Judge Nancy Gertner: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment entered.(Gaudet, Jennifer)
|
|
Filing
73
Magistrate Judge Robert B. Collings: ORDER entered. (See Order attached). (Dolan, Kathleen)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
