James B. Crook v. Hawk Scallop Co., Inc.
Plaintiff: James B. Crook
Defendant: Hawk Scallop Co. Inc.
Case Number: 1:2009cv10682
Filed: April 28, 2009
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Bristol
Presiding Judge: Rya W. Zobel
Nature of Suit: Plaintiff
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 30, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 162 Judge Rya W. Zobel: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM of Decision; Attorney Hunt within 30 days of the date of this order submit a detailed account; Plaintiff may file an opposition within 14 days thereafter.(Urso, Lisa)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: James B. Crook v. Hawk Scallop Co., Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James B. Crook
Represented By: Matthew Viveiros
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hawk Scallop Co. Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?