Menten v. Starbucks Corporation

Menten v. Starbucks Corporation

Plaintiff:	Tina Marie Menten
Defendant:	Starbucks Corporation
Case Number:	1:2009cv11545
Filed:	September 16, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Suffolk
Presiding Judge:	Richard G. Stearns
Presiding Judge:
Nature of Suit:	Plaintiff
Cause of Action:	28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
April 26, 2012	Filing 58 Ch. Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered denying 39 Motion for Summary Judgment. Trial will commence June 11, 2012, with a Final Pretrial Conference on June 7, 2012, at 3:00 p.m. (King, Kristin)
January 18, 2011	Filing 30 Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. The Court will hold a hearing on the Motion for Sanctions on February 3, 2011, at 3:00p.m. in Courtroom # 24. It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall appear personally, along with Counsel for both Partie s. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiffs counsel shall serve a copy of this Order upon the Plaintiff: (1) by email, if applicable; (2) by regular mail, postage pre-paid to her residence; and (3) by certified mail to the same address,return receip t requested. In addition, the Plaintiffs counsel shall notify the Plaintiff of this hearing by telephone or voice-mail message. If the Plaintiff fails to appear for this hearing, the Court may dismiss her case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for fa iling to comply with an Order of the Court and for failing to prosecute her claim; re 23 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 37(d) filed by Starbucks Corporation, Set Deadlines as to 23 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 37(d).( Motion Hearing set for 2/3/2011 03:00 PM in Courtroom 24 before Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin.)(Simeone, Maria)

Date Filed

Document Text

April 26, 2012

Filing 58 Ch. Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered denying 39 Motion for Summary Judgment. Trial will commence June 11, 2012, with a Final Pretrial Conference on June 7, 2012, at 3:00 p.m. (King, Kristin)

January 18, 2011

Filing 30 Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. The Court will hold a hearing on the Motion for Sanctions on February 3, 2011, at 3:00p.m. in Courtroom # 24. It is ORDERED that the Plaintiff shall appear personally, along with Counsel for both Partie s. It is further ORDERED that the Plaintiffs counsel shall serve a copy of this Order upon the Plaintiff: (1) by email, if applicable; (2) by regular mail, postage pre-paid to her residence; and (3) by certified mail to the same address,return receip t requested. In addition, the Plaintiffs counsel shall notify the Plaintiff of this hearing by telephone or voice-mail message. If the Plaintiff fails to appear for this hearing, the Court may dismiss her case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for fa iling to comply with an Order of the Court and for failing to prosecute her claim; re 23 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 37(d) filed by Starbucks Corporation, Set Deadlines as to 23 MOTION for Sanctions Pursuant to Rule 37(d).( Motion Hearing set for 2/3/2011 03:00 PM in Courtroom 24 before Magistrate Judge Leo T. Sorokin.)(Simeone, Maria)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Menten v. Starbucks Corporation
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Tina Marie Menten
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Starbucks Corporation
Represented By:	Jamie L. Matthews
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?