Tele-Publishing Inc. v. Facebook, Inc. et al
| Tele-Publishing Inc. |
| Facebook, Inc. and Thefacebook LLC |
| 1:2009cv11686 |
| October 7, 2009 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| Douglas P. Woodlock |
| Plaintiff |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
423
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered finding as moot 343 Motion to Strike ; finding as moot 359 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as moot 360 Motion to exclude; granting 361 Motion for Summary Judgment; finding as mo ot 366 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment; denying 369 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to subject matter patentability and finding the remainder moot; finding as moot 409 Motion to Strike. The Clerk is directed to enter final judgment for the defendants declaring the '216 Patent to be invalid because its subject matter is not patentable. (Woodlock, Douglas)
|
|
Filing
339
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered denying 317 Motion for Reconsideration after granting 331 Motion for Leave to File Reply Brief. (Woodlock, Douglas)
|
|
Filing
314
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered resolving claim construction issues remaining following Markman hearing. (Woodlock, Douglas)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
