Cooper v. Astrue

Cooper v. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Elroy Cooper
Defendant:	Michael J. Astrue
Case Number:	1:2010cv10782
Filed:	May 6, 2010
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Suffolk
Nature of Suit:	Disability Insurance
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 402
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
March 29, 2011	Filing 15 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered denying 11 Motion for Order Reversing Decision of Commissioner; granting 13 Motion for Order Affirming Decision of Commissioner (Zierk, Marsha)
June 7, 2010	Filing 4 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: in accordance with the May 11, 2010 Electronic Order, and for failure to comply with the directives therein, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Should plaintiff's co unsel seek to re-open this action, he must demonstrate good cause why he failed to comply with this Court's directives and why he failed to seek an extension of time if he believed further time was necessary. Additionally, counsel seeking leave to re-open this action shall also demonstrate good cause why he should not be sanctioned for wasting the judicial resources of this Court.(PSSA, 1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/7/2010: # 1 revised memorandum) (PSSA, 1).

Date Filed

Document Text

March 29, 2011

Filing 15 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered denying 11 Motion for Order Reversing Decision of Commissioner; granting 13 Motion for Order Affirming Decision of Commissioner (Zierk, Marsha)

June 7, 2010

Filing 4 Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: in accordance with the May 11, 2010 Electronic Order, and for failure to comply with the directives therein, this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice. Should plaintiff's co unsel seek to re-open this action, he must demonstrate good cause why he failed to comply with this Court's directives and why he failed to seek an extension of time if he believed further time was necessary. Additionally, counsel seeking leave to re-open this action shall also demonstrate good cause why he should not be sanctioned for wasting the judicial resources of this Court.(PSSA, 1) (Additional attachment(s) added on 6/7/2010: # 1 revised memorandum) (PSSA, 1).

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Cooper v. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Elroy Cooper
Represented By:	Michael J. Kelley
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?