Rasheed v. D'Antonio et al
| Rashad Rasheed |
| Angela D'Antonio, Marlene Dodge, Dyana Nicki, Bonnie Werner, Thomas Hicks, Terre Marshall, Brooke Van Sciver, John Beland, Heidi Herrick-Lynn, Joel T. Andrade, George D. Johns, Amy Owen, Adam Beck, Steven Bonetti, Ron Raymond, Anthony Mendonsa, Bruce Gelb, Pamela M O'Dell, Thomas Tocci, Chris Hyde, Thomas Dickhaut, Jeffrey Fisher, Mary Stowe, Anne M. Aucoin, Robert Almedia, Richard Solomon, Mark O'Neil, Philip Welsh, Robert Stork, John Jones, Peter St. Amand, Kristie Ladouceur, Julie E. Daniele and Harold W. Clarke |
| 1:2010cv11253 |
| July 22, 2010 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| George A. OToole |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
269
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Action on motion: ; denying 158 Motion for Protective Order; granting 161 Motion to Dismiss; denying 171 Motion for Reconsideration ; denying 172 Motion fo r Clarification ; denying 173 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 174 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; denying 176 Motion for Preliminary Injunction; finding as moot 192 Motion for Separate And Final Judgment ; denying 194 Mot ion for Relief from Judgment ; denying 204 Motion for Reconsideration ; granting 232 Motion for Summary Judgment; granting 244 Motion for Summary Judgment; denying 259 Motion for a G.L.C. 127 Section 38F and G.L.C. 124 Section 1(s) Medica l Chronic Care - Diabetes Care Items Preliminary Injunction; finding as moot 260 Motion for Entry of Judgment under Rule 54(b); denying 262 Motion for Reconsideration ; adopting Report and Recommendations re 267 Report and Recommendations.(Danieli, Chris)
|
|
Filing
258
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Action on motion: ; granting 142 Motion to Dismiss. The Claims Against Defendant Hager are Dismissed.(Danieli, Chris)
|
|
Filing
188
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE:PLAINTIFFS RENEWED MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL (DOCKET ENTRY # 177)is DENIED without prejudice.(Feeney, Eileen)
|
|
Filing
159
Judge George A. OToole, Jr: ORDER entered. ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS for 110 Motion to Dismiss filed by John Jones, 61 Motion for Protective Order filed by Rashad Rasheed, 90 Motion to Dismiss filed by Mary Stowe, 53 Motion to Dismiss filed by Robert Almedia, Bruce Gelb, 96 Motion to Dismiss filed by Julie E. Daniele, 99 Motion to Dismiss filed by Joel T. Andrade, George D. Johns, Heidi Herrick-Lynn, John Beland, Brooke Van Sciver, MHM Correctional Services, 64 Moti on for Protective Order filed by Rashad Rasheed, 48 Motion for More Definite Statement filed by Patti Onorato, Thomas Hicks, Marlene Dodge, Jeffrey Fisher, Angela D'Antonio, Dyana Nicki, Bonnie Werner, UMass Correctional Healthcare, 18 Motio n for Preliminary Injunction filed by Rashad Rasheed, 150 Report and Recommendations, 38 Motion to Dismiss, filed by Ron Raymond, Harold W. Clarke, Robert Stork, Peter St. Amand, Richard Solomon, Thomas Dickhaut, Adam Beck, Kristie Ladouceur, Mar k O'Neil, Philip Welsh, Allison Goldman-Hallett, Thomas Tocci, Amy Owen, Chris Hyde, Anthony Mendonsa, Pamela M O'Dell, Steven Bonetti, Anne M. Aucoin. action on motion: See the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, dated 8/1/11 150 for rulings. ( Copy of Order mailed out to plaintiff). (Lyness, Paul)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
