Andrews v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Justia Dockets & Filings First Circuit Massachusetts District Court Andrews v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Andrews v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority

Plaintiff:	Doris Speed Andrews
Defendant:	Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Case Number:	1:2011cv10232
Filed:	February 8, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office:	Boston Office
County:	Suffolk
Presiding Judge:	Joseph L. Tauro
Nature of Suit:	Other Labor Litigation
Cause of Action:	05 U.S.C. § 704
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
May 31, 2012	Filing 41 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM and ORDER.(Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)
March 2, 2011	Filing 5 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting 3 Motion leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue a summons; The Clerk shall send the summons, Complaint, and this Order to the plaintiff, who must thereafter serve the defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The plaintiff may elect to have service made by the United States Marshal Service. If directed by the plaintiff to do so, the United Sta tes Marshal shall serve the summons, Complaint, and this Order upon the defendant, in the manner directed by the plaintiff, with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States Marshal Service. Notwithstanding Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and Local Rule 4.1, the plaintiff shall have 120 days from the date of this Order to complete service. (PSSA, 1)

Date Filed

Document Text

May 31, 2012

Filing 41 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM and ORDER.(Geraldino-Karasek, Clarilde)

March 2, 2011

Filing 5 Judge Joseph L. Tauro: ORDER entered granting 2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting 3 Motion leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk shall issue a summons; The Clerk shall send the summons, Complaint, and this Order to the plaintiff, who must thereafter serve the defendant in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). The plaintiff may elect to have service made by the United States Marshal Service. If directed by the plaintiff to do so, the United Sta tes Marshal shall serve the summons, Complaint, and this Order upon the defendant, in the manner directed by the plaintiff, with all costs of service to be advanced by the United States Marshal Service. Notwithstanding Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) and Local Rule 4.1, the plaintiff shall have 120 days from the date of this Order to complete service. (PSSA, 1)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Andrews v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Doris Speed Andrews
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?