Sarvis v. Polyvore, Inc.
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|March 25, 2015
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS entered. The Court hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation, ALLOWS in part 56 the Motion to Dismiss, as to Counts IV and V, and OTHERWISE DENIES the Motion to Dismiss without prejudice to renewal of the arguments at summary judgment. (Montes, Mariliz)
|June 30, 2014
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: "For the foregoing reasons, 1) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint (Docket No. 37 ) is ALLOWED; 2) Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File a Reply to De fendant's Opposition (Docket No. 44 ) is DENIED AS MOOT; 3) Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (Docket No. 45 ) is DENIED AS MOOT; and 4) Plaintiff's Motion to Reconsider Dismissal of Plaintiff's Count for Polyvore's Vicarious Infringement (Docket No. 46 ) is DENIED. So ordered. "(Moore, Kellyann)
|September 20, 2013
Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. ORDER ON REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS Action on motion: ; granting 16 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim as to the vicarious infringement claim (Count five); adopting Report and Recommendations re 34 Report and Recommendations. "After consideration of Plaintiff's Objection thereto (Docket No. 35 ), Report and Recommendation is accepted and adopted." (Moore, Kellyann)
|August 9, 2013
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. Certification of Issue to State Court, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 16 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by Polyvore, Inc. is ALLOWED as to the vicarious infringement cla im (Count Five). This court further RECOMMENDS that the motion to dismiss be ALLOWED on or after September 9, 2013, as to the remaining counts unless plaintiff files a motion for leave to amend the amended complaint prior to September 9, 2013. ( Objections to R&R due by 8/23/2013)(Feeney, Eileen)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?