Hicks v. Ryan et al
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 21, 2014
Judge Richard G. Stearns: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered that the motion 32 of defendant Ryan to dismiss or for summary judgment, treated as a motion for summary judgment, is GRANTED; and plaintiffs motion 39 for stay of execution is DENIED. (PSSA, 4)
|September 16, 2013
Judge Richard G. Stearns: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting UMass Correctional Healths Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Docket No. 24); granting Amy Grenier and CNA Lucias Motion to Dismiss the Amended Complaint (Docket No. 26). In acco rdance with this Court's order dated May 9, 2013, and the plaintiff not having shown good cause why the claims, except for the Free Exercise claim against Warden Ryan, should not be dismissed be dismissed, it is ORDERED that the remaining claims against defendants Karen Dinardo, Luis Spencer, UMass Correctional Health; Matthew Arpano, Ms. Powers, Matthew Tolman, Timothy Bariamis, Aimee Grenier, Lucia and the Department of Correction are dismissed pursuant to pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Defendant Ryan is reminded that her answer to the Amended Complaint is due by September 20, 2013. Copy of Memorandum and Order sent by regular mail to plaintiff Hicks. (PSSA, 4)
|May 9, 2013
Judge Richard G. Stearns: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered granting 2 plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and assessing an initial, partial filing fee. The clerk shall issue a summons for service of the complaint on defendan t Ryan as to plaintiffs First Amendment Free Exercise claim and Defendant Ryan is required to respond to the complaint. Within forty-two (42) days of the date of this Memorandum and Order, Plaintiff shall show cause why his employment claim under th e Americans With Disabilities Act and the remaining Section 1983 claims should not be dismissed, or in the alternative, he shall file an amended complaint. Plaintiffs motion for appointment of counsel (Docket No. 5) is denied without prejudice. Pla intiffs motion for temporary restraining order (Docket No. 6) is denied. Plaintiffs motion to dispense with requirement for security (Docket No. 11) is denied as moot. Plaintiffs motion for service by U.S. Marshal (Docket No. 12) is granted, in par t, by permitting plaintiff to elect to have service of the complaint made by the United States Marshal Service on defendant Ryan. Plaintiffs motion to proceed on handwritten motions (Docket No. 13) is allowed. Plaintiffs motion to expedite depositi ons (Docket No. 15) is denied. Plaintiffs motion for speeding trial/hearing due to precarious health (Docket No. 16) is denied. The Clerk shall send the summons, complaint, and this Order to the plaintiff, who must thereafter serve defendant Ryan in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). (PSSA, 4)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?