VERRINDER v. WAL-MART CORPORATION et al
||William Verrinder and United States of America
||Wal-Mart Stores Incorporated, Sears Holding Corporation, Kmart and Rite AID Corp.
||May 9, 2013
||US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
||XX US, Outside State
||Patti B. Saris
|Nature of Suit:
||False Claims Act
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|June 21, 2016
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered. For the reasons set forth in the attached MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Defendant Wal-Marts Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 63 ) isALLOWED. Defendant Rite Aids Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 61 )is ALLOWED. Defendant Kmarts Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 59 )is ALLOWED in part. With respect to the generic drug allegationsonly, the Court allows the relator thirty days (July 21, 2016) to amend hiscomplaint to comply with Rule 9(b). (Molloy, Maryellen)
|March 3, 2015
Chief Judge Patti B. Saris: ORDER entered denying without prejudice 30 Motion to Unseal Document ; denying 30 Motion for Extension of Time; denying without prejudice 31 Motion to Amend ; denying 31 Motion to Appoint Counsel ; denying 34 Motion to Compel. This case shall be dismissed without prejudice unless, within 30 days of the date of this order, the relator (1) retains local counsel and files a motion to appear pro hac vice; or (2) retains counsel for all purposes. (PSSA, 3)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?