Sterilite Corporation v. Centrex Plastics, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Sterilite Corporation
Defendant:
Centrex Plastics, LLC
Case Number:
1:2013cv11485
Filed:
June 20, 2013
Court:
Massachusetts District Court
Office:
Boston Office
County:
Middlesex
Presiding Judge:
William G. Young
Nature of Suit:
Trademark
Cause of Action:
28:1338 Trademark Infringement
Jury Demanded By:
Plaintiff
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Sterilite Corporation v. Centrex Plastics, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Centrex Plastics, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Denise C. Lane |
| Represented By: | Peter D. McDermott |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sterilite Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Mark G. Matuschak |
| Represented By: | Brian J. Larivee |
| Represented By: | Julia M. Ong |
| Represented By: | Louis W. Tompros |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
