Host v. First Unum Life Insurance Company et al
| Brian Host |
| First Unum Life Insurance Company and Unum Group |
| 1:2013cv11578 |
| July 2, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Suffolk |
| George A. OToole |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
114
Judge Douglas P. Woodlock: MEMORANDUM ORDER entered denying ( 33 ) Motion for Summary Judgment and granting ( 36 ) Motion for Summary Judgment as to the merits in case 1:18-cv-11504-DPW. The parties are now directed to submit briefing and a propos ed order detailing the amount Unum owes Mr. Host in disability benefits, attorneys' fees and costs, and prejudgment interest. The briefing schedule is as follows: Mr. Host shall make a consolidated submission on or before November 5, 2021 in su pport of the precise form of judgment he seeks; Unum may respond on or before November 12, 2021; Mr. Host may reply to Unum's response, if any there be, on or before November 19, 2021. Associated Cases: 1:18-cv-11504-DPW, 1:13-cv-11578-GAO(Woodlock, Douglas)
|
|
Filing
108
Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr: ORDER entered granting in part and denying in part 76 Motion for Attorney Fees. (Halley, Taylor)
|
|
Filing
65
Judge George A. O'Toole, Jr: ORDER entered. ORDER Remanding case.(Halley, Taylor)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
