Foley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff: Jonathan Foley
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Case Number: 1:2013cv12107
Filed: August 28, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
Office: Boston Office
County: Plymouth
Presiding Judge: Joseph L. Tauro
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 21, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 230 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered granting 221 Wells Fargo's Motion for Release of Funds; denying 229 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to File Amended Complaint. The Clerk shall (1) issue a check payable to Defendant in the amount of the funds deposited by Plaintiff with the Court and (2) enter on the docket both the amount of funds paid to Defendant and the date of the payment. (Montes, Mariliz)
May 22, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 216 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered denying 214 Plaintiff's Motion for Reconsideration of and Relief from Order on Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of May 1, 2017. (Montes, Mariliz)
May 1, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 209 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered 180 Wells Fargos Motion for Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 180, is ALLOWED as to Counts I, III, and IV and DISMISSES this action. The parties shall file a joint status report within seven days proposing their joint or separate views as to the proper disposition of funds on deposit with the Court. The Preliminary Injunction, decided upon a different record, is VACATED. (Montes, Mariliz)
June 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 109 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER ON DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO TRANSFER AND DISMISS AND PLAINTIFFS MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION entered 64 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is ALLOWED; 80 Motion to Transfer Case is DENIED; 85 Motio n to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim is ALLOWED IN PART as to Count II and DENIED as to Count III (leaving Counts I, III and IV pending). Parties shall submit joint report by June 19, 2015 proposing whether these payments by Foley shall be deposited with the Clerk or a custodian as well as whether any party proposes a different amount; Wells Fargo shall file Answer to Complaint by June 12, 2015. The Court will hold a Rule 16 Conference on June 29, 2015 at 3:00 p.m. (Montes, Mariliz)
March 3, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 97 District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER DIRECTING CLASS COUNSEL TO FILE MEMORANDUM entered.(Simeone, Maria)
December 9, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 33 Judge F. Dennis Saylor, IV: MEMORANDUM & ORDER entered granting 25 Motion to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim. (Cicolini, Pietro)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Foley v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Foley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
Represented By: David M. Bizar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?