Conway et al v. Licata et al
| Andrew Conway and Liana Conway |
| Sam Licata, Sybil Hall, Stonehall Entertainment, LLC, Stonehall Merchandise, LLC, Stonehall Music Publishing, LLC, Stonehall Records, LLC, Stonehall Television, LLC and Stonehall Touring, LLC |
| 1:2013cv12193 |
| September 4, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
| Boston Office |
| Middlesex |
| William G. Young |
| Copyrights |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 501 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
373
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Because the Defendants are not a prevailing party the 369 Bill of Costs is DENIED. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
365
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered The Motion for Attorneys Fees and Costs (Doc. No. 344) is DENIED, the Bill of Costs (Doc. No. 351) is ALLOWED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, and the Motion to Alter the Judgment to Assess Prejudgment Inter est (Doc. No. 352) is ALLOWEDIN PART and DENIED IN PART. Within seven (7) days (11/13/2015), the parties shall file either a joint proposed amended judgment conforming to this Order or advise the Court that no such amended judgment is necessary. By joining in this filing, no party waives any objection or rights of appeal. (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
342
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW ON BENCH CLAIMS (Montes, Mariliz)
|
|
Filing
238
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. The Court ALLOWS IN PART AND DENIES IN PART 183 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and 193 Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendants' 189 Motion to Compel is ALLOWED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART, and Defendants' 220 Motion for Injunctive relief is DENIED. See Attached Memorandum. (Matteson, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing
182
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered. Plaintiffs' 172 Motion to Amend is ALLOWED IN PART to the extent that Plaintiffs seek to dismiss Counts VIII and XIV. The Motion is DENIED in all other respects. See attached Order. (Matteson, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing
145
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered ALLOWING IN PART and DENYING IN PART the plaintiffs' 141 Motion to Compel. See attached Order. (Matteson, Nicholas)
|
|
Filing
144
District Judge Leo T. Sorokin: ORDER entered For the foregoing reasons, the plaintiffs have not established a pattern of racketeering activity as required for a civil RICO claim. Accordingly, the defendants Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Doc. No. 75, is ALLOWED and Count XIX of the plaintiffs Complaint is DISMISSED re 75 Motion for Summary Judgment (Simeone, Maria)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
