Wittkowski v. Spencer et al
JoJo Wittkowski |
Luis Spencer, Mark Waitkevich, Steven Levine, Robert Deiner, Joel Andrade, Mark Burrows, Megan Dupuis and Neal Norcliffe |
1:2014cv11107 |
March 10, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Massachusetts |
Boston Office |
Plymouth |
Douglas P. Woodlock |
Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 226 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ALLOWING 200 Motion for Summary Judgment; ALLOWING 201 Motion for Summary Judgment; DENYING as Moot 224 MOTION for Funds to Hire and Expert Witness. (Vieira, Leonardo) |
Filing 182 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. Report and Recommendation accepted and adopted. re 176 Report and Recommendations. (Franklin, Yvonne) |
Filing 130 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDERIn accordance with the foregoing,1) The motion of the defendants Deiner, Andrade, Groblewski and Levine for referral to medical malpractice tribunal(Docket No. 113) is ALLOWED and2) the Clerk of Court is directed to refer plaintiffs medical malpractice claim to the Massachusetts Superior Court Department of the Trial Court for the purpose of convening a medical malpractice tribunal pursuant to M.G.L. c. 231, § 60B. So ordered.(Caruso, Stephanie) |
Filing 115 Judge Nathaniel M. Gorton: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 112 Motion Exemption from the Joint Statement. "Motion Allowed." (Caruso, Stephanie) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.