Jenkins v. City of Taunton et al
||City of Taunton, Edward Walsh, Mark Brady, Robert Kramer, Matthew Skwarto, Ralph Schlageter, Jeffrey Martin and Fred Bolton
||January 2, 2015
||US District Court for the District of Massachusetts
||William G. Young
|Nature of Suit:
||Other Civil Rights
|Cause of Action:
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 8, 2019
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. FINAL JUDGMENT. The issues having been duly heard and decisions rendered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED that plaintiff Rosemary Jenkins take nothing and that this action be DISMISSED with prejudice. (Patton, Christine)
|January 8, 2018
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Defendants' Motion to Correct the Summary Judgment Record (Docket Entry # 76 ); Defendants' Supplemental Motion to Correct the Summary Judgment Record (Docket Entry # 81 ). The motions to correct (Docket Entry ## 76 , 81 ) are DENIED. (Patton, Christine)
|September 29, 2017
Magistrate Judge Marianne B. Bowler: ORDER entered. MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Re: Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry # 58 ). The motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry # 58 ) is ALLOWED in part and DENIED in part. After num erous extensions of the dispositive motion deadline, there shall be no further extensions in this case, which plaintiff filed in January 2015. The parties shall file the status report relative to Count XIV within 14 days. This court will conduct a status conference on November 9, 2017 at 2:30 p.m. to set a trial date. (Patton, Christine)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Massachusetts District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?